Defending People

Share this post

User's avatar
Defending People
The Perry Trial
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

The Perry Trial

I explain self-defense, again.

Mark Bennett's avatar
Mark Bennett
Apr 11, 2023
∙ Paid
10

Share this post

User's avatar
Defending People
The Perry Trial
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
1
Share

Last week in Travis County, Daniel Perry was convicted of murder for shooting Garrett Foster in July, 2020. Perry, an Army Sergeant, was driving for Uber when he turned down a street on which Foster and others were protesting. He drove toward the protesters, and stopped. Foster approached his door, with an AK-47, and Perry shot him.

These are approximately the facts as they were publicized at the time, and it appeared to me then that this might have been a legally justified shooting. It wasn’t necessary for Perry to wait till Foster shot him before defending himself, nor even to wait till Foster brought the muzzle of his gun up. I thought that, given the zeitgeist, it might be reasonable for Perry to believe that his life was in immediate danger.

Defending People is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Andrew Branca, a “self-defense expert” with, as I’ve noted before, a rather narrow understanding of the la…

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Defending People to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 First Amendment Funding Organization
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More